The use of technological tools as a means of characterizing in flagrante delicto
limits of procedural norms and laws
Keywords:
criminal procedure, digital evidence, fundamental rights, flagrante delicto, technologyAbstract
This article analyzes the use of technological tools such as body cameras, environmental microphones, tracking devices, GPS systems, and digital monitoring mechanisms in the characterization of flagrante delicto within Brazilian criminal procedure. The study examines how these instruments contribute to criminal prosecution, particularly by strengthening material evidence and identifying offenders, while ensuring compliance with fundamental rights established in the Federal Constitution, statutory legislation, and General Data Protection Law. Based on a qualitative, exploratory, bibliographic, and documentary methodology, the research discusses the types of flagrante delicto provided by the Code of Criminal Procedure, investigates recent decisions from the Brazilian Supreme Court (STF) and Superior Court of Justice (STJ), and evaluates risks related to privacy, image protection, and personal data processing. The findings show that technology can enhance publicsecurity efficiency but requires strict legal limits, proportionality, and institutional oversight to prevent abuse and safeguard human dignity. The study concludes that technological advancement must be accompanied by adequate regulation, the best operational practices, and constitutionally guided interpretation.

