Comparison between endocrowns and conventional crowns

a literature review

Abstract

Endocrowns emerge as a promising alternative for the rehabilitation of extensively destroyed elements, aiming for a more conservative approach than traditional systems. This literature review aims to deepen knowledge on the endocrown technique, clarifying its indications, advantages, and clinical disadvantages. Methodology: A comprehensive search was conducted in the National Library of Medicine (PubMed) database, using the following descriptors: Endocrown, Dental restoration, Dental crown, Endodontic treatment. To support this review, we sought articles published from January 2014 to January 2024, and after a careful analysis, twenty articles were selected that met the pre-established criteria. Inclusion Criteria: We prioritized articles published in freely accessible journals, democratizing knowledge. Publication Date: We evaluated articles published in the last 10 years (from January 2014 to January 2024), ensuring the review was up-to-date. Relevance: We selected only articles that fit the central theme of the review, ensuring cohesion and quality of the presented material. It is concluded that endocrown restorations have proven to be an extremely promising option for molars extensively destroyed and endodontically treated. However, for other elements such as premolars, canines, and incisors, current studies have not shown positive results, which contraindicates the technique in these cases until further clinical studies indicate otherwise.