Analysis of the provisional execution of penalty referred to condemnial judgment

Authors

  • Pedro Ullysses Azevedo da Cruz
  • Jaqueline Ribeiro Cardoso

Keywords:

Condemning judgment, Provisional execution of sentence, Presumption of innocence

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the provisional execution of the sentence and its application in the Brazilian legal system, against the principle of presumption of innocence. The supreme court, opposing to its jurisprudence, at the judgment of Habeas Corpus 126.292, decided that the sentenced person in the second instance may immediately initiate the provisional execution of his sentence. It was possible to conclude that the provisional execution of the sentence motivated solely by reason of a condemnatory judgment can be challenged is in accordance with the constitutional principle of the presumption of innocence. It represents a legal retrogression, with total affront to the Brazilian constitution and the international treaties ratified by this country.

Published

2017-07-05

How to Cite

Ullysses Azevedo da Cruz, P. ., & Ribeiro Cardoso, J. . (2017). Analysis of the provisional execution of penalty referred to condemnial judgment. LIBERTAS: Journal of Applied Social Sciences, 7(1). Retrieved from https://periodicos.famig.edu.br/index.php/libertas/article/view/711

Most read articles by the same author(s)